Post if you have them run on your car......or if you run across them on line.
Thanks.
This guy pulled:
2003 BMW 330i ZHP (mileage : 19,900)
HP : 207
TQ : 200
http://i1015.photobucket.com/albums/.../stockdyno.jpg
Printable View
Post if you have them run on your car......or if you run across them on line.
Thanks.
This guy pulled:
2003 BMW 330i ZHP (mileage : 19,900)
HP : 207
TQ : 200
http://i1015.photobucket.com/albums/.../stockdyno.jpg
And another....
OP's comments.
Car is 330i zhp, with only Conforti intake and pulleys.
Got about 209hp at the rear wheel. With 15% driveline loss, that is about 246hp at the crank. Not bad considering factory rating is at 235hp.
From the graph you can see the 4200rpm dip. This is the most pronounced I've seen on any ZHP's dyno chart. I don't feel it at all when I'm driving, just hear the engine get louder at that rpm.
http://i1015.photobucket.com/albums/...Misc/323FT.jpg
Be sure to note the type of dyno the car was measured on.
DROIDstatus. Come at me, bro.
Interesting, as a "bone stock" is only 2 HP behind a "Conforti intake and pulleys" dyno, so clearly a dyno difference? John
I would thought the dyno numbers would be a tad bite higher. My Altima 3.5 V6 dynoed in at 218 at the wheel. That was with the Nismo CAI and underdrive pulleys. Nissan claims the VQ35de in the 02-04 Altima has 245hp at the crank.
I6 motors sacrifice some hp for smoothness and vibration reduction.
DROIDstatus. Come at me, bro.
Again...I think I am finding out, that dyno accuracies differ pretty widely.
The peak numbers on this dyno are not accurate. That jump at the end is due to a calculation error as the clutch is pushed in at the end of the pull and the drum speed and engine speed are no longer linear.
Of course, you guys know every dyno varies, and the most consistent by far are inertia dynos that have no user adjustable correction factor.
Ian
Ian
http://www.turnermotorsport.com/imag...6330_shark.pdf
You know, looking at this graph from Turner, it is interesting to see that with the shark, the 4k rpm dip/timing pull is just as present as without. I don't think the shark is our fix for that.
Ian
In addition to the other post in "Performance" section......maybe it feels less pronounced for me as I not only got the Shark, bt also was updated to latest 330i ZHP software.