Materials to Maintain Your ZHP IIIII Hand Protection IIIII Tools to Maintain Your ZHP
Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 74
  1. #21
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    1,630
    If BMW is going to continue to chase big unit numbers, it needs another sub-brand like Mini or Rolls Royce to avoid brand dilution. Toyota has Lexus & Scion. GM has Chevy (performance or all-American), Buick (China), Cadillac (luxury) and GMC (trucks/SUVs). When Daimler bought Chrysler, that didn't work out too well, but they still have Smart cars and a few truck brands.

    Perhaps the king of this is VW. Not only do they have Volkswagon, Audi and Porsche in their stable, but also Bentley, Skoda, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Ducatti and Scania. Maybe that's too many brands, but if GM has 4 and VW has 7 (for cars) I think BMW needs more than 3, isstead of having the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 series cars pus the X SAVs.

    The 2 big questions are..
    1) Should BMW's be the driving performance brand or should that be new sub-brand? ?
    2) Is it too late for BMW to make this change?

    And when driving enthusiasts leave BMW going, where do they go (besides to older BMWs)? Those with lots of money can of course go to Porsche, Audi R8, Tesla, Nissan GTR, McLaren, Italian Exotic, etc. But what about the rest? To Toyobarus? Ford Mustang? Mazda 3?

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,255
    Quote Originally Posted by LivesNearCostco View Post
    If BMW is going to continue to chase big unit numbers, it needs another sub-brand like Mini or Rolls Royce to avoid brand dilution. Toyota has Lexus & Scion. GM has Chevy (performance or all-American), Buick (China), Cadillac (luxury) and GMC (trucks/SUVs). When Daimler bought Chrysler, that didn't work out too well, but they still have Smart cars and a few truck brands.

    Perhaps the king of this is VW. Not only do they have Volkswagon, Audi and Porsche in their stable, but also Bentley, Skoda, Bugatti, Lamborghini, Ducatti and Scania. Maybe that's too many brands, but if GM has 4 and VW has 7 (for cars) I think BMW needs more than 3, isstead of having the 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 series cars pus the X SAVs.

    The 2 big questions are..
    1) Should BMW's be the driving performance brand or should that be new sub-brand? ?
    2) Is it too late for BMW to make this change?

    And when driving enthusiasts leave BMW going, where do they go (besides to older BMWs)? Those with lots of money can of course go to Porsche, Audi R8, Tesla, Nissan GTR, McLaren, Italian Exotic, etc. But what about the rest? To Toyobarus? Ford Mustang? Mazda 3?
    Great post, I think you're absolutely right. If BMW wants to start targeting these other markets, they're image is going to change drastically over time. VW group's 7 brands is definitely a lot, but I say why not? They've become the largest automotive group around, manufacturing a brand for a wide variety of markets. Their footprint in the industry is enormous. I understand why BMW would want their name of things like the i3 and even x series SUV's, but the amount of series they're beginning to produce seems like a bit overkill for a company that portrays a performance image.


    Edit: And since I come from a mustang background, I'll just say that I know the Mustang gets a lot of hate for its excessive popularity and cheap interior, etc., but it looks like they're getting back on the right track. The Coyote 5.0 Mustangs can really perform and even out performed the e92 M on track tests. Very affordable car with a great aftermarket community. I'm anxious to see how the new 2014+ models evolve.

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    32.8 N, 117.3 W
    Posts
    7,640
    VW also owns Seat (Spanish brand), which are considered to basically be cheap VW's (more basic) with different badges

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Ocean County, NJ
    Posts
    7,273
    I knew it was over for BMW when I read this article this summer. http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...omparison-test

    Among the painful things I read:

    Is it possible that the BMW has the worst steering here?

    The M Sport is capable, but it’s not as engaging as either opponent. It seems to say to the driver, “Here, I’ll do it.” And it does, but without the grace of the Lexus or the thrill of the Cadillac.
    -Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
    ZHP Pre-Ride Briefing

    2005 ZHP, Alcantara, Silver Cube, Nav, Sharked, BMW Perf Intake, BMW Perf CF Strut Brace, CF Valve/Fuel Rail Covers,
    Shadowline Grills, CF Splitters, Fog Light Inserts, Euro-mirrors, CDV Delete, Beisan vanos, GAS DISA, BP Coded

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Valparaiso, IN
    Posts
    3,595
    That's a sentence I never hoped to hear....


    Sent from my iPhone


  6. #26
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    18,064
    Quote Originally Posted by kayger12 View Post
    I knew it was over for BMW when I read this article this summer. http://www.caranddriver.com/comparis...omparison-test

    Among the painful things I read:

    Is it possible that the BMW has the worst steering here?

    The M Sport is capable, but it’s not as engaging as either opponent. It seems to say to the driver, “Here, I’ll do it.” And it does, but without the grace of the Lexus or the thrill of the Cadillac.
    Holy cow! BMW can't match the thrill of the Cadillac????? A Cadillac. Words I would have bet my life I'd never read. But you know, good for Cadillac (not that I'd ever buy one - I have my ZHP).
    Randeaux/Rando/John/jr - '06 Cic ZHP; Southern California
    "ZHP or not, I still like you"


    ZHP Performance Package, Cold Weather Package, Leather, Jet Black/Black/BlackCube, NAV, Anthracite Black "my individual" interior trim
    ESS Stage 1 Twin Screw Supercharger, Sprint Booster, BMW Perf Intake, Magnaflow Exhaust, Dinan TB & STEP S/W, UCC Sway Bars, Apex EC-7 18x8.5 ET38
    Suspension: AST 44100 dampers, Bimmerworld front adjustable end links, Swift springs (8K front, 10K rear), Vorshlag camber plates
    Dynavin D99+, Hardwire V1 (w/V1 Connection), BSW Stage 1 Speakers, Kicker Amp/Subwoofer
    BMW Performance Strut Brace, Orion V2 Angel Eyes, No-holes License Plate, SMG Paddle Shift Mod, Besian VANOS, Gold DISA, Fan Delete, M3 Side Mirrors
    Note: Actual car no longer resembles signature picture

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Austin TX
    Posts
    7,626
    I can't visualize in the same showroom a guy buying an M3 and a guy buying a minivan.

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Posts
    1,630
    And that is a problem Toyota and Honda face. They are so dominant in sensible sedans, SUVs, hybrids, econoboxes and minivans that it's hard for them to sell their brands as sporty. (Honda did have the Civic SI and Integra Type-R.) That's why the FRS is sold as a Scion and the past/future NSX is an Acura. BMW was dominating the sporty luxury car for drivers, but in their quest to increase unit sales, go mainstream, and comply with US CAFE regulations (and Euro carbon footprint taxes) they are loosing their mojo. I think their acquisition and relaunch of Mini was brilliant. Mini is fun, different, sporty, selling well, and it's okay to be FWD. It's close enough to BMW to enhance the BMW family affiliate (and help BMW with fleet average fuel economy) but separate enough not to dilute the BMW brand.

    Wonder if they could acquire or build another less-sporty brand that does FWD, minivans, and/or ultra-lux cars. Or have a more sporty division that is more independent or more "pure sports car" than the M division. Not sure SUVs have to be separate.. originally would have said yes, but if Porsche and Audi can have a successful SUV, then BMW sure can.

    One thing that puzzles me -- how does Subaru simultaneously do well in "practical all-wheel drive wagons for dog lovers and rural families" and in the Boost Buggy market?

  9. #29
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Branford, CT
    Posts
    16,055
    Quote Originally Posted by LivesNearCostco View Post
    One thing that puzzles me -- how does Subaru simultaneously do well in "practical all-wheel drive wagons for dog lovers and rural families" and in the Boost Buggy market?
    Well, the key thing to understand is that just because a car has boost, that doesn't necessarily mean that the owner/driver cares. This applies to the A to B drivers that don't really care about the driving experience.

    For the wagon lovers, well... most of Subaru's models are available with AWD, so those who want an AWD wagon and not have to pay through the nose can get one. For the Boost lovers, they have access to a car that is incredibly quick and can be made faster than most high-performance cars for less money than a brand new premium brand car, like a BMW 335i for example.

    As far as these niches go, Subaru's got this one locked down.
    BP
    2005 330i ZHP / 6MT
    Imolarot / Naturbraun
    2003 330iT / 6MT
    Orientblau / Naturbraun




    It's not the car you drive, it's how you drive it.

  10. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by Fried_Chicken View Post
    Looks to me like BMW copied Honda this time around.....I'll just stick to the E46 chassis myself....

Page 3 of 8 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Input on ZHPs?
    By M3TA5IN in forum General -- ZHP Related
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 05-30-2012, 08:01 PM
  2. Come support the kids
    By danewilson77 in forum East
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 05-02-2012, 08:46 AM
  3. Did all ZHPs come with a LUK LF-20?
    By sgplayer69 in forum Maintenance
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-31-2011, 08:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •