Please...........just a bit......
Maybe?
Now that were on a kick ass server.......please?
I recommend 700 wide x 240 high max.........
Please.
You're the best Marky. If we get slowdowns.....we can go back.
Printable View
Please...........just a bit......
Maybe?
Now that were on a kick ass server.......please?
I recommend 700 wide x 240 high max.........
Please.
You're the best Marky. If we get slowdowns.....we can go back.
I'd rather have smaller sigs and faster page loads. Especially when I'm on my BB or my Sprint wireless card.
Sigs don't load via tapatalk or forum runner.
But the signatures do load on blackberry, which is what Eli was intimating.
Tell you what: everyone should chime in here and tell me if they'd like bigger signatures.
I'll throw my hat in. I like smaller signatures -- and would not mind if they remained where they are.
Weigh in, guys/girls.
I vote bigger sigs.
Spend a lot of my time accessing and posting from Tapatalk, so it really doesn't matter to me.
Can the sigs get a little bigger without negatively impacting performance? Or would we have to experiment and then try to put the horse back in the barn?
Our server is pretty fast. I imagine that we're not worried about performance issues at this point. Instead, were more worried about distractions -- with the size of signatures.
Don't worry about performance.
If someone objects, it's because they don't want to see large signatures.
Understood. I like whatever makes the site look better. http://www.myemoticons.com/images/fl...witzerland.gif
I've voted for smaller sigs. I think they look better.
But I'm all for the people's choice approach.
I vote for small or medium sigs - certainly not bigger.