David, our group is so talented that I am now thinking about learning how to do photoshop.
Printable View
David, our group is so talented that I am now thinking about learning how to do photoshop.
450 doesn't allow for much of a landscaped sig....
Changing mine now....
That's true, DW. But it's the size that makes sense for the site.
We'll just have to get creative, partner.
Signature updated. From what I know, the file size is the determining factor on how fast the image loads, not the dimensions. It just so happens with larger dimensions you get larger file sizes - more information because of the extra area. In fact, you can force a resize of an image in html so it's displayed smaller, yet the entire image has to be downloaded for you to see it - same amount of bandwidth, but you see a smaller version when the page loads. I could be wrong, I haven't written any html in a while or know in-depth how a browser reads html these days. I'm pretty confident when a website requests an image load, you need to download the entire image, making file size the most important part of the image concerning loading times.
Aight...you made that sig yourself?Quote:
Originally Posted by Marcus-SanDiego
Kinda partial to this....600 pixels wide and/or 240 pixels high...but I will abide.
I just resized a photo that I had over at photobucket. Casey took the picture. I just changed the size of it.
Wow....you're a fast learnerererer.............
Thanks, DW. I know the size restrictions suck but I'm glad you guys understand.
Yup.....blood in, blood out. Whats best for the site should be in our interest.
You got it, pal. We're a tight-knit group here. We always do what's best.