I do 245/35 18x8.5 square just to throw more numbers out there for you.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
I do 245/35 18x8.5 square just to throw more numbers out there for you.
Sent from my SM-G955U using Tapatalk
Randeaux/Rando/John/jr - '06 Cic ZHP; Southern California
"ZHP or not, I still like you"
ZHP Performance Package, Cold Weather Package, Leather, Jet Black/Black/BlackCube, NAV, Anthracite Black "my individual" interior trim
ESS Stage 1 Twin Screw Supercharger, Sprint Booster, BMW Perf Intake, Magnaflow Exhaust, Dinan TB & STEP S/W, UCC Sway Bars, Apex EC-7 18x8.5 ET38
Suspension: AST 44100 dampers, Bimmerworld front adjustable end links, Swift springs (8K front, 10K rear), Vorshlag camber plates
Dynavin D99+, Hardwire V1 (w/V1 Connection), BSW Stage 1 Speakers, Kicker Amp/Subwoofer
BMW Performance Strut Brace, Orion V2 Angel Eyes, No-holes License Plate, SMG Paddle Shift Mod, Besian VANOS, Gold DISA, Fan Delete, M3 Side Mirrors
Note: Actual car no longer resembles signature picture
i went 235 square and got rid of them within a month to replace with 255 square. the difference is unbelievable.
17x9 et30 255/40 square
As another interesting datapoint, I run 205/50's on my 330xi's with Michelin Premiers, and they handle great, too--firm in the turns and no tramlining whatsoever. Plus, they're that much lighter. Sounds like sacrilege, but I am hard-pressed not to prefer them. It just goes to show that losing a little tire width isn't the end of the world.
Of course, I don't race or even track...
I wanted slightly more grip, but mostly I wanted a larger thermal ballast + larger dissipation area. I was melting tires on the track left and right, but mostly because I ran some PSS and they are great street, but awful track tires. Funny how fine the line is. I run RE-71R 255 and the grip is pretty high.
I just thought 255 was the ideal balance of weight and width. Anything wider kind of turns into a "who's is bigger"contest with minimal performance gains